This is a response to the article concerning the Kindle Shutting Out the Blind. The article speaks of the ruling that the Kindle must be accessible if it is to be used in College classrooms. The comments on the article are what drew my attention more than anything. Ridiculous statements such as “I think we need to turn the internet off too” and that “there are certain things that are not going to be available to you.” I felt obligated to respond but 550 characters weren’t enough. So, I’m taking the opportunity to respond here in my own blog. Here is what I wanted to say…
Stairs aren’t outlawed because public buildings have elevators and/or ramps. A great number of movies, television shows, even news programs have closed captioning for the hearing-impaired. These are all accommodations for which groups lobbied, went to court and won over a period of years, even decades.
Blind and visually-impaired individuals are asking for similar accommodations. These accommodations can easily be built into products when they are designed. They not only benefit us but they also benefit sighted individuals by providing an alternative means to access information. Talking watches, talking clocks, talking timers, even the small bump on the five on your numeric keypad allows you easier access to items and information.
Blindness need not mean exclusion from the products and materials we need to be successful in life. Textbooks are required in school but many aren’t available in an accessible format. We need to reach out to sighted individuals to read them to us or send them off to be recorded on tape, this takes valuable time away from our studies and is an added expense as the company that records the textbooks requires two copies.
We already have enough hurdles to navigate in higher education. Yet a majority of the materials needed to gain that education aren’t accessible to us. We need readers, note takers, proctors for tests, and more. Accessible textbooks would mean one less necessary accommodation but one huge step toward independence.
TTS was offered on the original Kindle. The menus weren’t accessible because they don’t talk, independent navigation of the machine was impossible but it did have TTS. That was a positive first step. The Author’s guild stepped in and demanded Amazon remove the feature. Amazon conceded and publishing companies can revoke the TTS feature from their books. As a result, not all books read on the Kindle have the TTS enabled, making them inaccessible to blind consumers.
Before you judge the desires of blind students so harshly, pay a visit to the disabled student services office at your local campus and ask them what it takes to attend school as a blind student. Some schools still don’t offer Braille markings on the doors to signify the room number. Elevators in multi-story buildings don’t have audible signals to let us know which floor we’re on; and many libraries don’t have the software necessary to provide us access to the Internet or their online content.
A lot of schools don’t even have accessible computers. Imagine dictating your English essay to a sighted student who has to type it. If you forget to dictate a period, comma, semi-colon or hyphen, your grade is at risk. If your aide forgets to read the punctuation correctly, it’s you who gets the lower grade, not the person who mis-read the work you dictated.
Reading is something sighted people take for granted. It’s a fundamental skill that every student needs in order to succeed. I agree that some things won’t be available to me as a blind person. I don’t expect to attain a driver’s license and I don’t expect I’ll ever be a brain surgeon but what right have you to tell me that I can’t have the right to read a textbook in a college where I pay the same tuition as my sighted peers? The Kindle can be made accessible to all. It’s what’s right - it’s what’s fair and, most importantly, it’s the law.